¿Qué significa justificar el derecho de autor?
Resumen
En la primera sección de este artículo se argumenta que el problema central del derecho de autor consiste en resolver la tensión entre dos intereses: el interés del titular de derechos de autor de controlar los usos de su obra y el interés del público de acceder a ella. Ello se hace mostrando cómo esta tensión se manifiesta en el concepto de autor y en el concepto de dominio público. A continuación, se responde a lo que se denomina "la objeción del escéptico". Por último, al establecer las condiciones que debe cumplir una teoría capaz de justificar el derecho de autor, se ofrece una estrategia para resolver la tensión identificada al comienzo de este trabajo.Palabras clave:
Derechos de autor, filosofía del derecho, tensión, justificación, adjudicaciónReferencias
Atria, Fernando (1999). «Del derecho y del razonamiento jurídico». Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 22: 79-120.
Benkler, Yochai (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedoms. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Boyle, James (2003). «The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain». Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1): 33-74.
Cerda Silva, Alberto (2013). «Una excepción a los derechos de autor para la comunicación pública de obras por pequeñas y medianas empresas». Revista de Derecho (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso), 40: 75-100.
Cohen, Felix (1935). «Trascendental nonsense and the functional approach». Columbia Law Review, 35 (6): 82-115.
Commitee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. Washington: National Academy Press.
Cotter, Thomas (1997-1998). «Pragmatism, economics and the droit moral». North Carolina Law Review, 76 (1): 2-96.
Delacroix, Sylvie (2006). Legal norms and normativity: An essay in genealogy. Oxford y Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
Dworkin, Ronald (1975). «Hard cases». Harvad Law Review, 88: 1057-1109.
Dworkin, Ronald (1978). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Eisenstein, Elizabeth (1980). The Printing Press as an agent of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fisk, Catherine (2003). «Authors at work: The origins of the work-for-hire doctrine». Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 15 (1): 1-70.
Fuller, Lon (1958). «Positivism and fidelity of law: A reply to professor Hart». Harvard Law Review, 71: 630-672.
Ginsburg, Jane (1988-1989). «French Copyright Law: A comparative overview». Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 36: 269-285.
Ginsburg, Jane (1990). «A tale of two copyrights: Literary property in Revolutionary France and America». Tulane Law Review, 64 (5): 991-1031.
Ginsburg, Jane (2002). «How copyright got a bad name for itself». Columbia Journal of Law & Arts, 26: 61-71.
Habermas, Jürgen (1990). «Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification». En Moral consciousness and communicative action (pp. 43-115). Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press.
Hughes, Justin (2011). «A short history of intellectual property in relation to copyright». Cardozo Law Review, 33: 1293-1340.
Jaszi, Peter (1991). «Towards a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of ‘authorship’». Duke Law Journal, 2: 455-502.
Kennedy, Walter B. (1936). «Functional nonsense and the trascendental approach». Fordham Law Review, 548: 272-300.
Lessig, Lawrence (2009). El código 2.0. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Litman, Jessica (1990). «The public domain». Emory Law Journal, 39 (4): 965-1023.
May, Christopher y Susan Sell (2006). Intellectual property rights: A critical history. Boulder y Londres: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Mirosevic, Camilo (2007). «Origen y evolución del derecho de autor con especial referencial derecho chileno». Revista de Derecho (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso), 28: 35-82.
Mossoff, Adam (2007). «Who cares what Thomas Jefferson thought about patents? Reevaluating the patent privilege in historical context». Cornell Law Review, 92: 953-1012.
Patry, William (1996). «The failure of the american copyright system: Protecting the idle rich». Notre Dame Law Review, 72: 907-933.
Rose, Mark (2003). «Nine-tenths of the law: The English copyright debates and the rhetoric of the public domain». Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1): 75-87.
Rothchild, John (2006). «The social costs of technological protection measures». Florida State University Law Review, 34: 1181-1220.
Singer, Joseph (1988). «Legal realism now: A review of ‘Legal realism at Yale: 1927-1960’ by Laura Kalman». California Law Review, 76: 467-1377.
Simmons, A. John (1999). «Justification and legitimacy». Ethics, 109 (4): 739-771.
Waldron, Jeremy (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy (2000). «‘Trascendental nonsense’ and system in the law». Columbia Law Review, 100 (16): 16-53.
Walker Echenique, Elisa (2014). Manual de propiedad intelectual. Santiago: Legal Publishing.
Weinrib, Ernst (1995). The idea of private law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Winner, Langdon (1980). «Do artifacts have politics?» Daedalus, 121-136.
Woodmansee, Martha (1984). «The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the author». Eighteenth Century Studies, 17 (4): 425-448.
Benkler, Yochai (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedoms. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Boyle, James (2003). «The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain». Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1): 33-74.
Cerda Silva, Alberto (2013). «Una excepción a los derechos de autor para la comunicación pública de obras por pequeñas y medianas empresas». Revista de Derecho (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso), 40: 75-100.
Cohen, Felix (1935). «Trascendental nonsense and the functional approach». Columbia Law Review, 35 (6): 82-115.
Commitee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. Washington: National Academy Press.
Cotter, Thomas (1997-1998). «Pragmatism, economics and the droit moral». North Carolina Law Review, 76 (1): 2-96.
Delacroix, Sylvie (2006). Legal norms and normativity: An essay in genealogy. Oxford y Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
Dworkin, Ronald (1975). «Hard cases». Harvad Law Review, 88: 1057-1109.
Dworkin, Ronald (1978). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Eisenstein, Elizabeth (1980). The Printing Press as an agent of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fisk, Catherine (2003). «Authors at work: The origins of the work-for-hire doctrine». Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 15 (1): 1-70.
Fuller, Lon (1958). «Positivism and fidelity of law: A reply to professor Hart». Harvard Law Review, 71: 630-672.
Ginsburg, Jane (1988-1989). «French Copyright Law: A comparative overview». Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 36: 269-285.
Ginsburg, Jane (1990). «A tale of two copyrights: Literary property in Revolutionary France and America». Tulane Law Review, 64 (5): 991-1031.
Ginsburg, Jane (2002). «How copyright got a bad name for itself». Columbia Journal of Law & Arts, 26: 61-71.
Habermas, Jürgen (1990). «Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification». En Moral consciousness and communicative action (pp. 43-115). Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press.
Hughes, Justin (2011). «A short history of intellectual property in relation to copyright». Cardozo Law Review, 33: 1293-1340.
Jaszi, Peter (1991). «Towards a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of ‘authorship’». Duke Law Journal, 2: 455-502.
Kennedy, Walter B. (1936). «Functional nonsense and the trascendental approach». Fordham Law Review, 548: 272-300.
Lessig, Lawrence (2009). El código 2.0. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Litman, Jessica (1990). «The public domain». Emory Law Journal, 39 (4): 965-1023.
May, Christopher y Susan Sell (2006). Intellectual property rights: A critical history. Boulder y Londres: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Mirosevic, Camilo (2007). «Origen y evolución del derecho de autor con especial referencial derecho chileno». Revista de Derecho (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso), 28: 35-82.
Mossoff, Adam (2007). «Who cares what Thomas Jefferson thought about patents? Reevaluating the patent privilege in historical context». Cornell Law Review, 92: 953-1012.
Patry, William (1996). «The failure of the american copyright system: Protecting the idle rich». Notre Dame Law Review, 72: 907-933.
Rose, Mark (2003). «Nine-tenths of the law: The English copyright debates and the rhetoric of the public domain». Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1): 75-87.
Rothchild, John (2006). «The social costs of technological protection measures». Florida State University Law Review, 34: 1181-1220.
Singer, Joseph (1988). «Legal realism now: A review of ‘Legal realism at Yale: 1927-1960’ by Laura Kalman». California Law Review, 76: 467-1377.
Simmons, A. John (1999). «Justification and legitimacy». Ethics, 109 (4): 739-771.
Waldron, Jeremy (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy (2000). «‘Trascendental nonsense’ and system in the law». Columbia Law Review, 100 (16): 16-53.
Walker Echenique, Elisa (2014). Manual de propiedad intelectual. Santiago: Legal Publishing.
Weinrib, Ernst (1995). The idea of private law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Winner, Langdon (1980). «Do artifacts have politics?» Daedalus, 121-136.
Woodmansee, Martha (1984). «The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the author». Eighteenth Century Studies, 17 (4): 425-448.
