This paper examines recent case law of the Chilean High Courts of Justice with regard to the right to strike. I analyse international legislation pertaining the right to strike, and the criteria for its effective practice. In particular, I look at the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and the ILO Convention 87, as well as national law, chiefly, the provisions made on that subject in the Political Constitution of the Republic, the Labour Code, and Internal State Security Law. I then examine the shift of paradigm that has taken place within The High Courts of Justice with regard to recent jurisprudence on the right to strike, a change
that establishes the extension of this right beyond negotiation procedures and bans ‘internal replacement’, which amounts to a step forward in its treatment as a fundamental right. Finally,
I draw a number of conclusions from the changes in the jurisprudence, and discuss the threat that the New Labour Reform poses for workers’ rights.
Keywords:
Right to strike, replacement workers, labour reform, capital-work conflict
Author Biography
Javier Nicolás Pineda Olcay, Universidad de Chile, Chile
Egresado de Derecho de la Universidad de Chile. Ayudante ad honorem de las cátedras de derecho penal, derecho administrativo y de derecho internacional de los derechos humanos de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Chile. Miembro de la Alianza Latinoamericana y Caribeña de Juventudes, organización vinculada a la revisión del Plan de acción de la conferencia internacional sobre población y desarrollo y a la Agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible de las Naciones Unidas. Encargado de relaciones internacionales de la organización de derechos humanos “Corporación 4 de Agosto” y miembro del Comité de iniciativa por la unidad sindical (CIUS).
Pineda Olcay, J. N. (2016). The Right to Strike in Chilean Case Law. Anuario De Derechos Humanos, (12), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.5354/adh.v0i12.42749