Disengagement between theories and probative practices. Ideas to rethink the professional training of lawyers and judges
| Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica del Derecho
This research addresses the gap between the expectations of judges and litigants about the academic literature on evidence law, and what this literature offers them. For the current state of the art, a case study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with judges, litigants, and scholars. The most relevant findings are: i) different perspectives about what is possible to achieve using evidence in judiciary procedures, especially, if the evidence of a trial can effectively determine what happened in the past; and ii) the types of academic knowledge expected by judges and lawyers, from practical stances, they expect in the literature the description of concrete trials cases with strategies to addressed them. These findings allow for rethinking how judges, lawyers and scholars narrow to relate with each other. Mostly, findings provide insights to address how to conceive professional training for who will participate in these communities.
Psicólogo, doctor en Políticas Educativas de la Universidad de Illinois Urbana-Champaign, CIAE, Instituto de Estudios Avanzados en Educación Universidad de Chile mauricio.pino@ciae.uchile.cl https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-7519
Rodrigo Coloma Correa, Universidad Alberto Hurtado
Abogado, doctor en derecho, profesor titular de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Alberto Hurtado, rcoloma@uahurtado.cl, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-7625
Altmetrics
How to Cite
Pino Yancovic, M., & Coloma Correa, R. (2020). Disengagement between theories and probative practices. Ideas to rethink the professional training of lawyers and judges. Revista Pedagogía Universitaria Y Didáctica Del Derecho, 7(1), pp. 91–118. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2020.54882